30 January 2006

Marx, Karl, the least funny brother

a week or so ago i thought that i should actually read the communist manifesto so that i can better rub commie's noses in their own crap. while trying to refind the place i was reading it at before i opened up a page to marxism.org. It's a collection of mailing lists, the most prominant of one requires "Determination • Humility • Militancy • Maturity". At least those people realize that they're fascist fucktards and being able to fight is important to fascist fucktards.

The modern labourer, on the contrary, instead of rising with the process of industry, sinks deeper and deeper below the conditions of existence of his own class. He becomes a pauper, and pauperism develops more rapidly than population and wealth. And here it becomes evident, that the bourgeoisie is unfit any longer to be the ruling class in society, and to impose its conditions of existence upon society as an over-riding law. It is unfit to rule because it is incompetent to assure an existence to its slave within his slavery, because it cannot help letting him sink into such a state, that it has to feed him, instead of being fed by him. Society can no longer live under this bourgeoisie, in other words, its existence is no longer compatible with society.

Is it just me or is Marx claiming that welfare is proof that the welfare state should be destroyed?

Goe, cause it's good to hate commies and the french.

No comments: